by NZARAYAPENGA PASIPANODYA in Washington, USA
WASHINGTON, (CAJ News) – THE meeting between President Donald Trump and South African President Cyril Ramaphosa at the White House on Wednesday was marked by unexpected tension when Trump played a video compilation of Julius Malema, leader of the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), singing the controversial song Kill the Boer.
The move blindsided Ramaphosa, who was there to discuss trade relations and South Africa’s stance on international issues. What was meant to be a diplomatic meeting quickly spiraled into an awkward spectacle, reinforcing Trump’s repeated habit of embarrassing his visitors at the White House.
Ramaphosa’s visit to Washington was intended to reset relations between South Africa and the U.S., which have been strained by Trump’s repeated claims that white farmers in South Africa are victims of genocide.
The South African government has consistently denied these allegations, citing crime statistics that show farm murders are part of broader violent crime trends rather than targeted racial extermination.
Trump’s assertion that white farmers are fleeing South Africa due to racial persecution has been widely debunked. Crime data from the South African Police Service (SAPS) and independent research institutions indicate that farm attacks affect both black and white farmers, with no evidence of a systematic campaign against white landowners.
Additionally, South Africa’s legal framework protects property rights, and land reform policies aim to address historical injustices without dispossessing individuals based on race.
Despite the fall of apartheid in 1994, white South Africans continue to enjoy economic advantages. Studies show that white South Africans still hold a disproportionate share of wealth and land ownership compared to the black majority.
While affirmative action policies have sought to redress past inequalities, structural disparities persist in education, employment, and business ownership. White farmers still control a significant portion of agricultural land, with estimates suggesting they own around 50% of all land in South Africa. This legacy of apartheid-era land policies has given them access to established infrastructure, financial resources, and generational wealth, allowing them to maintain dominance in commercial agriculture.
Black farmers, on the other hand, often struggle with limited access to land, financing, and technical support. While land reform programs have redistributed some farmland, bureaucratic inefficiencies and corruption have slowed progress.
Many black farmers operate small-scale or subsistence farms, lacking the capital to expand into commercial agriculture. White farmers generally benefit from economies of scale, advanced technology, and established market networks, making them more competitive in the agricultural sector.
They are more likely to be involved in high-value crops and export markets, whereas black farmers often face barriers to entry due to limited resources and market access.
Efforts to bridge the gap include land redistribution programs and financial support for emerging black farmers. However, these initiatives have faced criticism for inefficiencies and slow implementation.
Some experts argue that black land ownership is higher than commonly reported, but challenges in productivity and profitability persist. The economic disparities between white and black farmers underscore the broader inequalities that still exist in post-apartheid South Africa.
Ramaphosa, visibly frustrated by Trump’s video stunt, reiterated that South Africa does not condone racial violence and that Malema’s rhetoric does not reflect government policy. The South African president emphasized the need for constructive dialogue rather than inflammatory accusations.
At one point, trying to cut through the tension, Ramaphosa quipped, “I wish I had a plane to give you,” referencing Trump’s fixation on military aircraft in previous meetings. But the humor did little to ease the growing discomfort in the room.
The embarrassment of this moment was not just felt by Ramaphosa but was also another example of Trump’s continued habit of humiliating foreign leaders in the White House. His meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky was similarly awkward, as Trump pressured Zelensky to investigate political rivals, leading to his first impeachment.
British Prime Minister Theresa May endured a tense meeting in which Trump abruptly criticized NATO, dismissing the alliance’s relevance in an offhand remark. French President Emmanuel Macron found himself publicly lectured about his country’s tariffs, while German Chancellor Angela Merkel received an awkward refusal of a handshake in front of cameras.
These incidents have contributed to a growing perception that Trump’s approach to diplomacy is more about spectacle than substance. His tendency to embarrass visiting dignitaries has raised concerns about the U.S.’s global standing, with critics arguing that such moments undermine serious discussions on trade, security, and international cooperation.
Ramaphosa’s visit was meant to strengthen economic ties, but instead, it became another example of Trump’s habit of turning diplomatic engagements into controversial spectacles.
The controversy surrounding the meeting highlights the ongoing challenges in U.S.-South Africa relations and the need for nuanced discussions on historical and contemporary inequalities.
As South Africa continues to navigate the complexities of land reform and economic justice, sensationalized accusations from global leaders threaten to overshadow the real work needed to bridge historical divides. Trump’s handling of this meeting not only undermined the diplomatic intent but also reinforced concerns about his inability to conduct international relations with the dignity and tact expected of a world leader.
– CAJ News